This is a completely imaginary work, which I penned a couple of weeks back. Since the time I became a Dhoni follower, I personally had to face many questions from his critics, which I answered with pleasure. I have had 'n' number of debates, discussions and hot moots, face to face as well as on the online platforms, almost of all of which were healthy.
Here, when I indite this, I presume myself to be in the interviewer's seat and I would be asking all the questions, which I had to face from my fellow-critics till date. And sitting opposite to me, I presume to be a virtual Mahendra Singh Dhoni, who would be answering these questions, like the way you wanted him to answer.
Let our creative juices flow in visualizing such a scenario and virtually relish the interview :)
The interview starts !
Q: You’ve been one of the most successful captains ever in
the game. While some glorify you as a great captain, some give you the label of
just being the captain of a great Indian team. Some say Indian team rose to glory
because of a great MSD but others say MSD rose to glory because of a great
Indian team. What’s your say on this?
A: Public can never be homogenous. Mixture of people implies
mixture of opinions. All cannot think the same way. Therefore, differences of
opinions are prone to occur. To me, both the schools of thinking are not
conflicting. They are just complementary. Cricket is not like lawn tennis!
Cricket is a team game. A single person cannot play for all the eleven players
of a team. Match-winners evolve for just one game. A single person cannot bring
glory to the team unless he is equally complemented by the others in the team.
I am proud enough to say that I have got a great team. I’m lucky enough to be
the captain of a team with each player having an outstanding potential. So,
both the statements are partially true and inter-dependent.
Q: I think you need a bit more clarification on the
question. Let us take for example, when Sourav Ganguly was the Indian captain,
Indian cricket was in shatters. Neither did we have foundation, nor pillars. He
started from the first step of building up a team. There was only Sachin and a
couple of other in form batsman. Statistics say cricketers like Harbhajan
Singh, Yuvraj Singh, Virender Sehwag etc evolved under Ganguly. So when you
became the captain, you had to start only from where Ganguly left. You had
finished products in your side. Didn’t that make your job a lot easier?
A: Ganguly is indeed
a great captain. There’s no denying the fact that many of our players evolved
during his reign as a captain. But I did not start from where Ganguly left it.
If my memory and the stats is right, I started from where Rahul Dravid left. I
started from where Anil Kumble left. My first assignment as a captain was the
inaugural ICC Twenty 20 World Cup back in 2007. If I remember right, it was
also a time where Indian cricket was in complete turmoil. We had performed
pretty poorly at the 50-over format World Cup in West Indies the same year, and
when it came to the Twenty 20 World Cup, I lead a team without Sachin
Tendulkar, Zaheer Khan, Rahul Dravid, Anil Kumble, VVS Laxman and many more big
names. Ours was a much inexperienced squad with some new names like Rohit
Sharma, Yusuf Pathan etc. Robin Uthappa, Sreesanth, Joginder Sharma etc were
all young bloods. Just like how Bhajji, Yuvi and Viru evolved during Ganguly’s
time, Rohit Sharma, Virat Kohli, Suresh Raina, Ravichandran Ashwin evolved
during this period. Every captain can give you his list of players like this. Indian
cricket under myself and Ganguly are two entirely different phenomena which
cannot be compared. It is tough to make comparisons. We only see the negative
side of everything. Indian cricket had a good time under Ganguly. If you
believe Indian cricket is having a good time under me, let us all be happy
about it.
Q: Analysts and cricket experts point out that Indian
cricket has seen the best and the worst form in recent times. We won the World
Cup last year and the same team India lost 8 overseas test matches consecutively.
Your comments?
A: It is a law of nature that a good thing has to be
followed by a bad thing which in turn, gets followed by a good thing and so on.
If there is a high, there ought to be a low. Please don’t think that I am
holding science as an excuse to our poor performance in Test matches, but I was
reasoning out some facts. Bad times will come. At the end of the day, it is all
about overcoming the bad times. That is when you stand the test of time. The
conditions were tough for us in England and Australia. We had players who were
totally unaccustomed to the conditions there. At the same time, we had legends
like Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid and VVS Laxman who had a lifetime
experience playing abroad. Unfortunately, all of us failed equally which meant
there was something wrong. Taking nothing away from the opposition, we still
could have played our game better. There were a lot of areas where things did
not go upto the level of our expectations.
Cricket is an interesting game. Some things may seem ironic. But then,
where is the beauty of the game without these little ironies and surprises?
Q: Isn’t the main reason behind the team’s failure,
especially that of the batting department, the above-the-limit exposure to the
Twenty 20 format? Aren’t the players after being involved in so many of the
shorter-version games, especially in the Indian Premier League, finding it
tough to adapt to the change in formats? We saw a lot of batsmen getting out
due to lack of impatience, attempting risky shots. Do you support this
argument? Don’t you think the proportion of each format in the International
schedule of each player change?
A: We indeed have played a lot of twenty-twenty games,
especially in the IPL. But I do not know how much of blame is to be put on the
IPL and other T20 tournaments for our failure. VVS Laxman is someone who was
not involved in any twenty20 game. At the same time, the only batsman who made
merry was the young Virat Kohli who even scored a very good century in
Australia is someone who has played more number of twenty 20 games than anybody
else. So, I do not think playing twenty -twenty game has a deep impact on other
formats. The main reason for our failure, when I word it, is the unfamiliar
circumstances. We could see how difficult Indian batsmen get to the
short-pitched deliveries. Probably the next time we go there, we might perform
better. To substantiate my views, you can take the India-England series we
played here in India just after our overseas series. What we suffered in their
soil, they suffered here in our soil. So, it is up to adapting to the
situations. It is a common phenomenon in the cricketing arena.
Q: How far has the new generation Indian cricket gone, with
the likes of Dravid and Laxman retiring and Sachin to retire soon?
A: Dravid and Laxman were playing only in the Test format in
the last few years. If you are asking about the Test format, we are satisfied
with the current state of affairs as of now. Laxman’s retirement announcement
came just before the beginning of the New Zealand series. There could not have
been a greater blow for the team than this. But Pujara was called as a last
minute replacement and he scored a match-winning century in the first test
match. We could also whitewash the series. Look, one thing which every cricket
follower needs to understand is that, cricket will move on regardless of
anything. There was an under 19 Virat
Kohli and now, we have an Unmukht Chand. Unmukt replaces a 2008 Virat Kohli and
Virat has now replaced a 2008 Rahul Dravid. I am not comparing Virat with
Rahul. It is still early to make comparisons. But still, replacements will
come. After all, India is a country with n number of cricketers. By saying
this, I am also sure, that in near future, even Mahendra Singh Dhoni will find
a replacement, hopefully, a better replacement. Indian cricket followers have
this common blind belief that Indian cricket will find its end when the big
ones retire. It is a wrong conviction. They think so because, over the years,
they have been so used to seeing Indian elevens with the big ones. This has
made them incapable to think of a team without the senior players. But the
strange truth is, cricket will move on, in the same fashion, even after their
time. It will be the same even after my time, even after Kohli’s time.
Q: The Twenty-20 World cup is approaching. Subcontinent
conditions and team’s current form – how much of hope can be assigned on the
team’s shoulders?
A: Yes, we do have a good chance of winning the cup, but the
competition is tough. Talented youngsters are coming up in each and every team.
You cannot rule out even Afghanistan’s team. Twenty 20 is such a game. But
going into the tournament with current form, yes, we do have a strong chance of
playing well. Personally, I give more weightage to performance than results. Win
or loss, at the end of the day, we have to make sure that we gave our hundred
percent.
Q: Another curious aspect of this World Cup is the return of
Yuvraj Singh. How do you see that, making a comeback in a tournament as big as
the World Cup?
A: Well, Yuvi is a fighter. He comes back to the side, which
means he has fought and won. Fighting a dangerous disease needs strong will and
determination. We all know about him. He has a never say die attitude. World
cup or a small series, he knows what it is all about and he won’t happier to
return at any other point of time. From the team’s point of view, this is the
time when we need Yuvi the most. Personally, everybody is ecstatic about his
return. He is a great asset not only on the field, but off the field too. He
gives a better shape to the entire group. Also, we have another Singh tiger
returning in Bhajji. It is a delight to have him back at this stage.
Q: You have got the tag of an elegant gentleman. You are a
missing face in those usual late night parties. You keep things to the basic
level. You are someone who got married quickly, quick when compared to others.
You’re a family man. Are these the main reason you stay away from many rumors? Is
this the kind of lifestyle the younger generation, especially the cricketers
have to adopt?
A: Everybody has their own likes and dislikes. I am such
because I like to be so. You say I have got the tag of an elegant gentleman. I
am happy about it. It shows that whatever I have done, the things you
mentioned, have not gone the wrong way. But it does not entail that others
should follow it. They can live their lives the way they want. Attending late
night parties, hanging out with friends – all this can be done, nothing wrong
about it as long as you make sure you give your best, your hundred percent to
the main thing you do, that is, your game called cricket. When it comes to
staying away from rumors, yes, they might be helping you in some way. The less
you are involved in a risk, the less dangerous things get. But in this modern
world, there are even people who love to be rumors. So, it is a strange world
and one has to choose the lifestyle one wants to. This is something to be
followed off the field. On field, Dhoni is Dhoni, Viru is Viru, Yuvi is Yuvi,
Zaheer is Zaheer.
Q: You are someone who does things differently. In the
twenty over world cup finals, you gave the last over to Joginder Sharma. In the
fifty over world cup final, you replaced an in-form Ashwin with an out of form
Sreesanth. But everything has worked out quite well for you. There’s a quote
saying winners do not do different things, they do things differently. You have
yourself quoted this on the same context in a popular advertisement. What makes
you take these decisions? Intelligence? Luck? Courage? Or is it a mixture of
everything? If I give the tag ‘lucky’ to you, how will you take it? We have
seen matches where the top order batsmen build up the innings during a chase
and then finally you come and finish it off. You’ve got the luck to build
pillars many a times on the basement someone else has built. Your thoughts on
this?
A: Interesting question. If you consider just coming in and
finishing off the match something that great, then I would accept that I am
lucky because I know I have done it on an n number of occasions. But the area
where I tend to disagree is the same. I do not think finishing off a match is
all that great. If it was some other player batting in place of me, the same
thing would have happen. The credit always goes to the man who has built the basement,
not the pillar. The case of top order batsmen doing the job and me taking the
credit is interesting. It is interesting because, the men who in your terms
have built the basement could have built the pillars too. But they could not.
They build the basements and then they get out. Unless a batsman gets out, the
next batsman cannot walk in. Thus, I get to walk in and then it becomes my job
to steer the team home.
Doing things differently – is something winners do. But the
real fun comes when you analyze some situations carefully. You quoted Joginder
Sharma and Sreesanth because at both instances, my decisions have not done any
harm. The team has won both the matches. But if the same match was lost by an
extra no-ball or something, this question would not have even arisen. We have
this behaviour called selective absorption. I can point out many similar games
where I have gone with a little different approach which ultimately never
worked out. Both happen, success and failure both come at their own nice
intervals. Some people notice something; others may notice the opposite of it.
So, it is ultimately up to you to judge your successes and failures.
Q: Any final words to your fans, especially going into the
world cup?
A: Yes. They are the backbone for us. The crowd support is
the real driving force for a team. It is quite evident when we play home
matches. Even when we played in countries like England and South Africa, the
Indian supporters residing there, came to the ground to watch the match, creating
a home-like atmosphere for us. All I have to tell everyone of them is, to keep
supporting us. Not just supporting, keep motivating, criticizing, monitoring
and appreciating whenever whatever is needed to be done. We, not just in the
upcoming world cup, but also in all future aspects, make a vow to try and give
our hundred percent so that regardless of the result, we can hold our heads
high!
~ Interview Ends - Suggestions are welcome !